Bitten
One NYC girl's quest to see the world ...
and write about it
8.25.2011
Ugh ...
I haven't updated this baby in a very long time. I feel ashamed. But the silver lining is that I HAVE been writing stuff on a consistent basis. I promise to do better here, but check out my latest piece on group travel on GoJaneNews.com!
5.09.2011
Feel like a drink?
Temple Bar in Dublin, Ireland |
Or read it online here.
Let me know what you think!
5.03.2011
Tweet, tweet, travel, travel
Readers of Bitten, I just wanted to let you know that I now am an avid Tweeter. For travel updates, and updates on my daily activities, follow me @SmellTheRosy.
That is all.
That is all.
4.27.2011
Piling on the baggage
It looks like the federal government is stepping in to regulate airlines a bit. And unlike the annoyingly stupid full body security scans instituted last year, these regulations actually look like they're going to benefit travelers. Shocking, I know.
The Transportation Department's new rules, which are slated to go into effect in about four months or so, will mean that airlines will have to refund baggage fees if they lose your luggage — they're already required to compensate you for the value of your lost goodies. But you're out of luck if your bag is delivered eventually (no matter how far down 'eventually' is). Airlines won't be required to reimburse you if the bag comes late.
The new rule also will make airlines include all fees, taxes and hidden costs in their advertised prices. I don't know about you, but I think it's immensely annoying when I'm planning to book a flight because it's this great deal I found only to be slapped with $100-plus extra on the final cost. Kind of defeats the whole beauty of the deal, doesn't it?
Also — and I'm extremely lucky this has never happened to me — but apparently airlines have kept passengers on the tarmac for up to 10 hours. Ridiculous! Well, it's not going to happen anymore. The Transportation Department is expanding the tarmac delay rules — which already say that domestic flights can't hold passengers on board without food, water and access to bathrooms for more than three hours — to include international flights at a cap of four hours.
This last rule is one that I think shouldn't even have to be implemented because the premise of the violation behind it is so absolutely absurd — but at least something's being done about it, I suppose. Carriers will have to pay passengers up to twice the cost of their ticket, capped at $800, if they're bumped from an overbooked flight (it was a $400 max before).
Carriers shouldn't be overbooking flights anyway!!! Seriously. I understand it's all a money game, but come on! If, for whatever reason, the flight is booked and someone doesn't show up or cancels, there's always stand-bys hanging on for hope that they'll make it on that last-minute flight. Put them on the flight, rather than overbooking it to start and then having to reschedule the passengers that are bumped. Wouldn't that save everyone time and perhaps some headaches?
Anyway, at least those unfortunate people will get some sort of compensation now. Because, let's face it, how many flights cost you less than $200 these days?
The Transportation Department's new rules, which are slated to go into effect in about four months or so, will mean that airlines will have to refund baggage fees if they lose your luggage — they're already required to compensate you for the value of your lost goodies. But you're out of luck if your bag is delivered eventually (no matter how far down 'eventually' is). Airlines won't be required to reimburse you if the bag comes late.
The new rule also will make airlines include all fees, taxes and hidden costs in their advertised prices. I don't know about you, but I think it's immensely annoying when I'm planning to book a flight because it's this great deal I found only to be slapped with $100-plus extra on the final cost. Kind of defeats the whole beauty of the deal, doesn't it?
Also — and I'm extremely lucky this has never happened to me — but apparently airlines have kept passengers on the tarmac for up to 10 hours. Ridiculous! Well, it's not going to happen anymore. The Transportation Department is expanding the tarmac delay rules — which already say that domestic flights can't hold passengers on board without food, water and access to bathrooms for more than three hours — to include international flights at a cap of four hours.
This last rule is one that I think shouldn't even have to be implemented because the premise of the violation behind it is so absolutely absurd — but at least something's being done about it, I suppose. Carriers will have to pay passengers up to twice the cost of their ticket, capped at $800, if they're bumped from an overbooked flight (it was a $400 max before).
Carriers shouldn't be overbooking flights anyway!!! Seriously. I understand it's all a money game, but come on! If, for whatever reason, the flight is booked and someone doesn't show up or cancels, there's always stand-bys hanging on for hope that they'll make it on that last-minute flight. Put them on the flight, rather than overbooking it to start and then having to reschedule the passengers that are bumped. Wouldn't that save everyone time and perhaps some headaches?
Anyway, at least those unfortunate people will get some sort of compensation now. Because, let's face it, how many flights cost you less than $200 these days?
4.17.2011
A resident visitor
It's interesting going back to a place that you used to live in as a visitor. (See what I had to say about it here.) In a way the nostalgia gets to you. Because you don't live there anymore. You ARE an outsider now.
On the other hand, it's really nice to be able to visit somewhere just to relax and see the people you came to see without worrying about running around to all the tourist attractions you have to see in the five days you're there.
There's always something new to discover, especially in a city like London, so my recent trip there was far from boring. I actually spent most of my days wandering around parts of the city I hadn't been to in the three months I lived there four years ago. It was great to be able to relax and wander around with my friends, and to see the things that someone just visiting probably wouldn't bother to see.
However, it is nice to visit your old hangouts and neighborhood. It's fun to see what's changed and comforting to note what hasn't (like my favorite sandwich shop with the best sandwiches ever right by Hyde Park). It's brings back good memories of good times once had.
All in all, a great trip to a place I love with wonderful people. What could be better?
Relaxing with some fish pedicures |
A gorgeous day at Kew Gardens |
Strolling in the old 'hood |
All in all, a great trip to a place I love with wonderful people. What could be better?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)